Inca – Final Rating

Look at it gloat!

I could undoubtedly use my reviewer powers and punish Inca with bad scores, but I want to leave all enmity behind and give a fair rating.Puzzles and Solvability

The major problem of Inca is simply that the ratio of adventurish parts and action parts is way off for an adventure game. Even when I leaped over all the simulator bits, I still spent most of my time walking through a maze and shooting Spaniards.

If only I had seen more of this

Despite this, puzzles, the little the game had, were not that bad. Few of them were somewhat bland – meaningless rituals I solved just by clicking everything on anything. Some of them were quite good – getting out of my holding cell in the galleon and the final puzzle involving three magical gems were two especially intriguing specimens, where the solution was found by first experimenting properties of things and then using these properties creatively.

All in all, I was fairly positive about the puzzles, but not about the amount of puzzles.

Score: 3.

Interface and Inventory

The interface and inventory as such were quite adequate and simple to use. One click to take it, one click to use it. Clearly indicated hotspots and text telling what I am pointing at, if I couldn’t otherwise understand it. What else to wait for?

Well, a proper way to save your game. It was bad enough that the game used save codes, especially when sudden death was lurking behind almost every corner. It was even worse that the save points were so few and far between that I faced an arduous task when death forced me to replay.

Luckily modern technology allows screenshots, so I didn’t have to write all these codes down

Score: 3.

Story and Setting

I imagine that pitching round for Inca went something like: “Let’s have a space fight between Inca spaceship and Spanish space galleon…

…because it would look AWESOME!”

The basic premise is suitably cheesy, and it would perhaps be a little too much to ask that the game would have explored it more deeply – instead of seriously considering reasons why this supposedly space faring civilization could have been conquered by conquistadors, it offers us merely a cliche after cliche, such as an EEEEVIL enemy to battle with, a wise and mystical shaman to guide you and an obligatory romance. Even so, the story of Inca is not just cliched, but too patchy to hold together, and plot details are thrown around without any rhyme or reason. For instance, what is the motivation of conquistadors? Are they after riches? Or are they perhaps trying to convert the last remaining space Incas? Both options seem viable – Aguierro tries to convince his crew by promising them money, and his galleon works as a portal to heaven – but neither avenue is seriously considered, because the game is too much in a hurry to kick some Spanish butt.

Score: 4.

Sounds and Graphics

Coktel Vision has always been rather competent in the music department and they don’t fail this time either. The tunes belong to a genre I could call Inca pop – you know, music using traditional South American instruments, like pan pipes, charango and synthesizer. It’s quite catchy and some of the themes will most likely continue their stay as earworms.

Graphics are more of a mixed bag. There are evocative images, such as the oft mentioned Spanish galleon, but most of the game is spent watching bulky canyons and drab brown corridors.

The colour of boring

Score: 5.

Environment and Atmosphere

There’s so much wasted potential in this game. The databank of Inca culture, which you can access at the beginning of the game, shows that the developers did their research meticulously. Even if its basic premise derives more from ufology than anthropology, the game does pay homage to the traditions of the actual Incas, with which the rituals you perform are connected. Problem is that due to the overwhelming quantity of action scenes the interesting ideas are drowned out by mindless shooting.

3. A game that is more about energy blasts than about Incas

Score 4.

Dialogue and Acting

The writing of the game is serviceable, if not particularly memorable, with some cliched phraseology suitable for the cliched story structure. Again, the highlight were the sections where the producers had made an effort to familiarise the players with Inca traditions.

There were exactly two actors with spoken lines. Firstly, there was the ship computer which was probably made by Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, since it had the same cheery attitude as Eddie, the computer aboard the Heart of Gold. Secondly, the voice actor of Huayna Capac made a very convincing job and actually sounded like he was speaking whatever language Incas spoke (considering that I know nothing about the language of Incas nor do I know any Native American language whatsoever, this recommendation says absolutely nothing).

Score: 5.

(3 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 5)/.6 = 40.

Inca rises just above the worse games of the year. This seems quite appropriate, since there were parts of the game I felt good about. If you don’t dislike the simulator nor the maze parts you might even enjoy Inca. Onward to CAP distribution!

100 CAPs to Ilmari

• Blogger Award – 100 CAPs – For playing through Ince for everyone’s enjoyment

• Psychic Prediction Award – 10 CAPs – For correctly guessing the Final Rating of Inca
• True Companion Award  – 25 CAPs – For playing Inca along with Ilmari and giving extensive commentary on the game
• Level Design Award – 4 CAPs – For suggesting what Shooting Addict would discuss
• Gender Roles Award – 6 CAPs – For instigating an interesting discussion about the intended gender of adventure game protagonists

• Almost Psychic Prediction Award – 5 CAPs – For correctly guessing that Ilmari wouldn’t have good time with the game

• History Buff Award – 5 CAPs – For finding a probable source for the antagonist of Inca